IGBT FF1000R17IE4
Carlosgs91 (Talk | contribs) |
Carlosgs91 (Talk | contribs) |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | == Download == | ||
+ | {{#dlmodel: FF1000R17IE4 | http://www.igbtmodel.org/images/e/e6/IGBT_FF1000R17IE4.zip }} | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Identification tool == | ||
+ | The parameter extraction has been done by means of a Matlab-PSpice optimization tool, the POPM (Parameter Optimizer for Pspice Models) which you can find [[POPM|here]]. It is a user-friendly Graphic User Interface (GUI) that you can use on your own. | ||
== Tests performed == | == Tests performed == | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Static === | ||
+ | |||
+ | Fig. 1 reports the comparison between the datasheet information and the simulated static output characteristics. More precisely, Fig. 1 (a) shows the IGBT output characteristics at 150ºC for the following gate voltages: VGE=8V, 10V, 12V and 15V. Fig. 1 (b) displays the simulated static output characteristics as a function of temperature (i.e., T= 25ºC and T=150ºC) for a given gate voltage (VGE =15V). | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| style="margin: 0 auto;" | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [[File:IGBT FF1000R17IE4 static.PNG|link=|thumb|600px|Fig. 1. Static response.]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |} | ||
=== Dynamic === | === Dynamic === | ||
− | [[File:IGBT FF1000R17IE4 dynamic.PNG|600px]] | + | |
+ | Fig. 2 (a) shows the comparison between measured and simulated turn-off waveforms at the following testing conditions: IC=560 A, VDC=900V and T=25C. The comparison between the PSpice simulation and experimental results validating the temperature-dependent IGBT model under inductive switching conditions are shown in Figs. 2(b) and 2(c) at 75ºC and 125ºC, respectively. Fig. 2 (d) shows the comparison between the experimental curves at different current and voltage levels (IC=670 A, VDC=1100V). | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| style="margin: 0 auto;" | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | [[File:IGBT FF1000R17IE4 dynamic.PNG|link=|thumb|600px|Fig. 2. Dynamic response.]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |} | ||
=== Shortcircuit === | === Shortcircuit === | ||
− | |||
− | === | + | The nominal short-circuit conditions for experimental analysis were: DC-link voltage VDC=700V, gate voltage VGE=15V, gate resistance Rg=1.2 , short circuit time tsc = 10 us and stray inductance Ls=40nH. Fig. 3 shows the comparison between the simulation waveforms and measured waveforms during a short-circuit type 1 event. |
− | + | ||
− | + | {| style="margin: 0 auto;" | |
− | { | + | |- |
+ | | [[File:IGBT FF1000R17IE4 sc.PNG|link=|thumb|600px|Fig. 3. Short circuit response.]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |} |
Latest revision as of 17:50, 5 December 2015
Contents |
[edit] Download
[edit] Identification tool
The parameter extraction has been done by means of a Matlab-PSpice optimization tool, the POPM (Parameter Optimizer for Pspice Models) which you can find here. It is a user-friendly Graphic User Interface (GUI) that you can use on your own.
[edit] Tests performed
[edit] Static
Fig. 1 reports the comparison between the datasheet information and the simulated static output characteristics. More precisely, Fig. 1 (a) shows the IGBT output characteristics at 150ºC for the following gate voltages: VGE=8V, 10V, 12V and 15V. Fig. 1 (b) displays the simulated static output characteristics as a function of temperature (i.e., T= 25ºC and T=150ºC) for a given gate voltage (VGE =15V).
|
[edit] Dynamic
Fig. 2 (a) shows the comparison between measured and simulated turn-off waveforms at the following testing conditions: IC=560 A, VDC=900V and T=25C. The comparison between the PSpice simulation and experimental results validating the temperature-dependent IGBT model under inductive switching conditions are shown in Figs. 2(b) and 2(c) at 75ºC and 125ºC, respectively. Fig. 2 (d) shows the comparison between the experimental curves at different current and voltage levels (IC=670 A, VDC=1100V).
|
[edit] Shortcircuit
The nominal short-circuit conditions for experimental analysis were: DC-link voltage VDC=700V, gate voltage VGE=15V, gate resistance Rg=1.2 , short circuit time tsc = 10 us and stray inductance Ls=40nH. Fig. 3 shows the comparison between the simulation waveforms and measured waveforms during a short-circuit type 1 event.
|