IGBT FF1000R17IE4

From IGBTModel.org
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Protected "IGBT FF1000R17IE4" (‎[edit=sysop] (indefinite) ‎[move=sysop] (indefinite)))
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{#dlmodel: IGBT_FF1000R17IE4 | http://www.igbtmodel.org/images/e/e6/IGBT_FF1000R17IE4.zip }}
+
== Download ==
 +
{{#dlmodel: FF1000R17IE4 | http://www.igbtmodel.org/images/e/e6/IGBT_FF1000R17IE4.zip }}
 +
 
 +
== Identification tool ==
 +
The parameter extraction has been done by means of a Matlab-PSpice optimization tool, the POPM (Parameter Optimizer for Pspice Models) which you can find [[POPM|here]]. It is a user-friendly Graphic User Interface (GUI) that you can use on your own.
 +
== Tests performed ==
 +
 
 +
=== Static ===
 +
 
 +
Fig. 1 reports the comparison between the datasheet information and the simulated static output characteristics. More precisely, Fig. 1 (a) shows the IGBT output characteristics at 150ºC for the following gate voltages: VGE=8V, 10V, 12V and 15V. Fig. 1 (b) displays the simulated static output characteristics as a function of temperature (i.e., T= 25ºC and T=150ºC) for a given gate voltage (VGE =15V).
 +
 
 +
{| style="margin: 0 auto;"
 +
|-
 +
| [[File:IGBT FF1000R17IE4 static.PNG|link=|thumb|600px|Fig. 1. Static response.]]
 +
|-
 +
|}
 +
=== Dynamic ===
 +
 
 +
Fig. 2 (a) shows the comparison between measured and simulated turn-off waveforms at the following testing conditions: IC=560 A, VDC=900V and T=25C. The comparison between the PSpice simulation and experimental results validating the temperature-dependent IGBT model under inductive switching conditions are shown in Figs. 2(b) and 2(c) at 75ºC and 125ºC, respectively. Fig. 2 (d) shows the comparison between the experimental curves at different current and voltage levels (IC=670 A, VDC=1100V).
 +
 
 +
{| style="margin: 0 auto;"
 +
|-
 +
| [[File:IGBT FF1000R17IE4 dynamic.PNG|link=|thumb|600px|Fig. 2. Dynamic response.]]
 +
|-
 +
|}
 +
 
 +
=== Shortcircuit ===
 +
 
 +
The nominal short-circuit conditions for experimental analysis were: DC-link voltage VDC=700V, gate voltage VGE=15V, gate resistance Rg=1.2 , short circuit time tsc = 10 us and stray inductance Ls=40nH. Fig. 3 shows the comparison between the simulation waveforms and measured waveforms during a short-circuit type 1 event.
 +
 
 +
{| style="margin: 0 auto;"
 +
|-
 +
| [[File:IGBT FF1000R17IE4 sc.PNG|link=|thumb|600px|Fig. 3. Short circuit response.]]
 +
|-
 +
|}

Latest revision as of 17:50, 5 December 2015

Contents

[edit] Download

FF1000R17IE4

[edit] Identification tool

The parameter extraction has been done by means of a Matlab-PSpice optimization tool, the POPM (Parameter Optimizer for Pspice Models) which you can find here. It is a user-friendly Graphic User Interface (GUI) that you can use on your own.

[edit] Tests performed

[edit] Static

Fig. 1 reports the comparison between the datasheet information and the simulated static output characteristics. More precisely, Fig. 1 (a) shows the IGBT output characteristics at 150ºC for the following gate voltages: VGE=8V, 10V, 12V and 15V. Fig. 1 (b) displays the simulated static output characteristics as a function of temperature (i.e., T= 25ºC and T=150ºC) for a given gate voltage (VGE =15V).

Fig. 1. Static response.

[edit] Dynamic

Fig. 2 (a) shows the comparison between measured and simulated turn-off waveforms at the following testing conditions: IC=560 A, VDC=900V and T=25C. The comparison between the PSpice simulation and experimental results validating the temperature-dependent IGBT model under inductive switching conditions are shown in Figs. 2(b) and 2(c) at 75ºC and 125ºC, respectively. Fig. 2 (d) shows the comparison between the experimental curves at different current and voltage levels (IC=670 A, VDC=1100V).

Fig. 2. Dynamic response.

[edit] Shortcircuit

The nominal short-circuit conditions for experimental analysis were: DC-link voltage VDC=700V, gate voltage VGE=15V, gate resistance Rg=1.2 , short circuit time tsc = 10 us and stray inductance Ls=40nH. Fig. 3 shows the comparison between the simulation waveforms and measured waveforms during a short-circuit type 1 event.

Fig. 3. Short circuit response.
Latest updates
Info
- Total users: 1444
- Total downloads: 1234
- Recent changes
- List of users
Find us on
IGBTModel.org - Contact us here - Legal